<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Totally Lame Twitter Marketing Techniques</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/</link>
	<description>&#34;What Not To Do&#34; Twitter Marketing Guide by Twitters and for Twitters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter tips and resources &#124; Spotlight on Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter tips and resources &#124; Spotlight on Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] “Totally lame twitter marketing techniques” by Michael Kristof and Chad Engle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Totally lame twitter marketing techniques” by Michael Kristof and Chad Engle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb/Blue Sky Pottery</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb/Blue Sky Pottery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I wholly agree with the comments made about automatic replies, about the pages of messages all from the same person, and the hard-sell marketing by some twitterers. I&#039;d like to add that it&#039;s lame to be using profanity (I unfollow those twitterers)or to be discussing really personal things like very specific health problems. I do appreciate a touch of humor, breaking news, and don&#039;t mind a reasonable amount of marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholly agree with the comments made about automatic replies, about the pages of messages all from the same person, and the hard-sell marketing by some twitterers. I&#8217;d like to add that it&#8217;s lame to be using profanity (I unfollow those twitterers)or to be discussing really personal things like very specific health problems. I do appreciate a touch of humor, breaking news, and don&#8217;t mind a reasonable amount of marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-57</guid>
		<description>@Chad: Good points. There&#039;s a much bigger picture to what Twitter offers and can become for everyone. And we&#039;ve already started seeing it&#039;s power with; &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.twitter.com/search?q=motrinmoms&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;motrinmoms&lt;/a&gt;, how a recent earthquake was reported on Twitter way before it hit regular news sources, re-tweeting a daughter&#039;s need for a kidney transplant, and just today, how Pepsi quickly learned that print ads advocating suicide are in poor taste.

This is why I feel that it&#039;s important for users to learn and understand some twitter best practices -- it makes it more enjoyable to users on a personal level and helps strengthen the entire community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chad: Good points. There&#8217;s a much bigger picture to what Twitter offers and can become for everyone. And we&#8217;ve already started seeing it&#8217;s power with; <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=motrinmoms" rel="nofollow">motrinmoms</a>, how a recent earthquake was reported on Twitter way before it hit regular news sources, re-tweeting a daughter&#8217;s need for a kidney transplant, and just today, how Pepsi quickly learned that print ads advocating suicide are in poor taste.</p>
<p>This is why I feel that it&#8217;s important for users to learn and understand some twitter best practices &#8212; it makes it more enjoyable to users on a personal level and helps strengthen the entire community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-56</guid>
		<description>OK Mine is a bit more nebulous, because it&#039;s more of a &#039;feeling&#039; that I get behind the tweets, rather than content. but I can&#039;t stand people who use talk about using twitter or the internet in all of their tweets, and also talk about how to expand their social network. I think this is kind of what Michael was talking about with sounding &#039;robotic.&#039; You know marketing. We get it. A lot of times, and this only makes it worse, they *pontificate* about it, as well. It&#039;s one of those things that just kind of pushes it over the edge from being annoying to obnoxious. ie. &quot;*Wondering* how Twitter can be used to gain ROI&quot; &quot;*Learning* about 368 new ways to gain new followers.&quot;

This is more of a personal one, and other people probably have way more tolerance than I do, but I have had such an overwhelmingly positive experience with Twitter as a tool for community advancement, that I find using it explicitly, or talking about using it, to make money just doesn&#039;t rub me the right way. I guess I feel that people going into it looking to gain investment, or advancement, or whatever, have completely missed the boat in terms of its usefulness.

Not to be too negative, I like the tight-knit feel that I get from the design community. One of the things that I find the most bizarre about my feelings on Twitter, is that I actually think it&#039;s really nice to see a blog post retweeted a bunch of times by all of my twitter friends. This probably sounds really, really weird... But I thought that would drive me completely nuts, clogging up my feed with the same link, but instead it has this totally cool, positive infectious spread vibe to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Mine is a bit more nebulous, because it&#8217;s more of a &#8216;feeling&#8217; that I get behind the tweets, rather than content. but I can&#8217;t stand people who use talk about using twitter or the internet in all of their tweets, and also talk about how to expand their social network. I think this is kind of what Michael was talking about with sounding &#8216;robotic.&#8217; You know marketing. We get it. A lot of times, and this only makes it worse, they *pontificate* about it, as well. It&#8217;s one of those things that just kind of pushes it over the edge from being annoying to obnoxious. ie. &#8220;*Wondering* how Twitter can be used to gain ROI&#8221; &#8220;*Learning* about 368 new ways to gain new followers.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is more of a personal one, and other people probably have way more tolerance than I do, but I have had such an overwhelmingly positive experience with Twitter as a tool for community advancement, that I find using it explicitly, or talking about using it, to make money just doesn&#8217;t rub me the right way. I guess I feel that people going into it looking to gain investment, or advancement, or whatever, have completely missed the boat in terms of its usefulness.</p>
<p>Not to be too negative, I like the tight-knit feel that I get from the design community. One of the things that I find the most bizarre about my feelings on Twitter, is that I actually think it&#8217;s really nice to see a blog post retweeted a bunch of times by all of my twitter friends. This probably sounds really, really weird&#8230; But I thought that would drive me completely nuts, clogging up my feed with the same link, but instead it has this totally cool, positive infectious spread vibe to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info. It&#039;s helpful to know things like those listed here. Being kinda new to twitter, this should be required reading :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info. It&#8217;s helpful to know things like those listed here. Being kinda new to twitter, this should be required reading <img src='http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: renaissance chambara &#124; Ged Carroll - Links of the day</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>renaissance chambara &#124; Ged Carroll - Links of the day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] Totally Lame Twitter Marketing Techniques - Thanks to Alex Annable for this gem, scroll down and read the comments (^_^) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Totally Lame Twitter Marketing Techniques &#8211; Thanks to Alex Annable for this gem, scroll down and read the comments (^_^) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael lamb</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>michael lamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I will totally unfollow you if you are following 49 people and have 50 followers. Meaning the only one you&#039;re not following is me. Yeah, sorry, I take it personally, can&#039;t help it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will totally unfollow you if you are following 49 people and have 50 followers. Meaning the only one you&#8217;re not following is me. Yeah, sorry, I take it personally, can&#8217;t help it. <img src='http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motrin, Twittermoms, and the Power of Social Networking</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Motrin, Twittermoms, and the Power of Social Networking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] latter, generally ends up as lame twitter marketing. Using spam tactics and worst practices and techniques for pimping their wares. These are the same [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] latter, generally ends up as lame twitter marketing. Using spam tactics and worst practices and techniques for pimping their wares. These are the same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael E. Carluen</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Carluen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-30</guid>
		<description>First off, Thank you Michael and Chad for putting this together.

Here&#039;s my short list to add:
(It applies to lame marketing as well as lame tweeting in-general)
1) Its lame when I get consecutive tweets (seconds apart) that all I see on half of my status page is your avatar for the next 3 minutes.
2) Its lame when your tweets sounds robotic. I almost expect to see bias or opinion in every tweet- shows that there a real person with a personality behind it.
3) Its lame when you send an auto-response DM or @reply when its obvious that you haven&#039;t read my bio, my tweet history or even my last tweet before you sent it.
4) Its lame when the twitter&#039;s presence solely hides (anonymously) behind a logo and just a nickname. Most companies with presence in Twitter have known real people with real faces and real full names represented as well. (Example: Most of us know that Twitter has @ev, @al3x, and @biz)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, Thank you Michael and Chad for putting this together.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my short list to add:<br />
(It applies to lame marketing as well as lame tweeting in-general)<br />
1) Its lame when I get consecutive tweets (seconds apart) that all I see on half of my status page is your avatar for the next 3 minutes.<br />
2) Its lame when your tweets sounds robotic. I almost expect to see bias or opinion in every tweet- shows that there a real person with a personality behind it.<br />
3) Its lame when you send an auto-response DM or @reply when its obvious that you haven&#8217;t read my bio, my tweet history or even my last tweet before you sent it.<br />
4) Its lame when the twitter&#8217;s presence solely hides (anonymously) behind a logo and just a nickname. Most companies with presence in Twitter have known real people with real faces and real full names represented as well. (Example: Most of us know that Twitter has @ev, @al3x, and @biz)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swizec</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Swizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guilty of the last one I think. But I&#039;m honestly looking for user feedback rather than trying to sell something. That is, if I see someone is using an app of mine I will ask them what it&#039;s like and give them a follow so I can keep up with them and see if they ever happen to have trouble or find the product lacking in any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guilty of the last one I think. But I&#8217;m honestly looking for user feedback rather than trying to sell something. That is, if I see someone is using an app of mine I will ask them what it&#8217;s like and give them a follow so I can keep up with them and see if they ever happen to have trouble or find the product lacking in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Colvin</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Colvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I have another lame marketing tactic that really bugs me. I am a &quot;fangirl&quot; of some of the things I buy &amp; use, for example, CarMax (have purchased numerous cars from them) and FreshBooks (do my invoicing with them) and everytime I recommend them to other people, I get new followers from used car lots and invoicing software companies, obviously looking to snag my attention.

But if you read my tweets about these products &amp; services, you&#039;ll see I am a loyal customer. (In other words, unfortunately I don&#039;t need or care about the stuff YOU are selling me.)

Finding people who need what you have, and selling it to them or at least making them aware of it, is not wholly bad. But these would be welcome followers, if marketing people did a little research. For example, if I complained in a few tweets I needed invoicing software, and you discover this in a search, then you can approach me and say something like &quot;Hey, I saw you&#039;re having trouble. We sell software that addresses that problem, if you&#039;re interested.&quot; You can do this without even following them, by simply sending a message to @username. You don&#039;t have to include the link - they will check out your bio. 

Believe me, if you have a cool product someone need, and you approach them casually and make it about them, you likely wont&#039; offend, and if you do they will ignore it and don&#039;t have to deal with you following them and feeling like they will be spammed now.

ONLY follow people who interest you personally - if that&#039;s someone who needs your service, great, but know that when you do it right after they use a keyword of yours, it feels like a salesman coming to your door when you&#039;re in a nightgown... UNWANTED!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have another lame marketing tactic that really bugs me. I am a &#8220;fangirl&#8221; of some of the things I buy &amp; use, for example, CarMax (have purchased numerous cars from them) and FreshBooks (do my invoicing with them) and everytime I recommend them to other people, I get new followers from used car lots and invoicing software companies, obviously looking to snag my attention.</p>
<p>But if you read my tweets about these products &amp; services, you&#8217;ll see I am a loyal customer. (In other words, unfortunately I don&#8217;t need or care about the stuff YOU are selling me.)</p>
<p>Finding people who need what you have, and selling it to them or at least making them aware of it, is not wholly bad. But these would be welcome followers, if marketing people did a little research. For example, if I complained in a few tweets I needed invoicing software, and you discover this in a search, then you can approach me and say something like &#8220;Hey, I saw you&#8217;re having trouble. We sell software that addresses that problem, if you&#8217;re interested.&#8221; You can do this without even following them, by simply sending a message to @username. You don&#8217;t have to include the link &#8211; they will check out your bio. </p>
<p>Believe me, if you have a cool product someone need, and you approach them casually and make it about them, you likely wont&#8217; offend, and if you do they will ignore it and don&#8217;t have to deal with you following them and feeling like they will be spammed now.</p>
<p>ONLY follow people who interest you personally &#8211; if that&#8217;s someone who needs your service, great, but know that when you do it right after they use a keyword of yours, it feels like a salesman coming to your door when you&#8217;re in a nightgown&#8230; UNWANTED!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Herbert</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Would it make sense to have a twitter hashtag devoted to this topic? Just wondering. It may spread out the information and create two sources which won&#039;t help. But maybe this blog post becomes the aggregation, filtering and &quot;at length&quot; fireside chat on the topic.

Thanks for coming up with this idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it make sense to have a twitter hashtag devoted to this topic? Just wondering. It may spread out the information and create two sources which won&#8217;t help. But maybe this blog post becomes the aggregation, filtering and &#8220;at length&#8221; fireside chat on the topic.</p>
<p>Thanks for coming up with this idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swizec</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Swizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-26</guid>
		<description>People who don&#039;t follow after an @reply conversation. Sometimes I&#039;ll see a RT of someone and respond and even have a whole conversation, sometimes these are people I&#039;m following who aren&#039;t following back ...

I dunno, guess it just seems kind of rude that after I&#039;ve helped you out you don&#039;t even have the courtesy to follow.

Anyone else agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who don&#8217;t follow after an @reply conversation. Sometimes I&#8217;ll see a RT of someone and respond and even have a whole conversation, sometimes these are people I&#8217;m following who aren&#8217;t following back &#8230;</p>
<p>I dunno, guess it just seems kind of rude that after I&#8217;ve helped you out you don&#8217;t even have the courtesy to follow.</p>
<p>Anyone else agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-25</guid>
		<description>When I see someone is following 1000 people but only has 7 followers, I don&#039;t have to read any tweets to know it&#039;s spam.

Auto-response with a URL. (I don&#039;t mind the automated &quot;Thanks for following,&quot; it seems polite to me)

SPELLING MISTAKES!!! You&#039;re not chatting to a friend, you&#039;re representing your company. GRR.

@simpsonsparadox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I see someone is following 1000 people but only has 7 followers, I don&#8217;t have to read any tweets to know it&#8217;s spam.</p>
<p>Auto-response with a URL. (I don&#8217;t mind the automated &#8220;Thanks for following,&#8221; it seems polite to me)</p>
<p>SPELLING MISTAKES!!! You&#8217;re not chatting to a friend, you&#8217;re representing your company. GRR.</p>
<p>@simpsonsparadox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randulo</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>randulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-24</guid>
		<description>There is a terrific service, Twitterfeed.com to inject blog posts or podcast RSS into your tweets, but a few people use it poorly. One trap is the little preface it allows you to insert. Like a signature, these things wear out pretty fast. &quot;Check this out! http://....&quot; is a bad start IMO. These feeds need to be a small percentage of what you do, too or you might as well use &quot;Spamstream:&quot; as a header. I think if you set twitterfeed to limit posts to 1 every 2 hours, you&#039;ll find a good balance. YMMV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a terrific service, Twitterfeed.com to inject blog posts or podcast RSS into your tweets, but a few people use it poorly. One trap is the little preface it allows you to insert. Like a signature, these things wear out pretty fast. &#8220;Check this out! <a href="http://...." rel="nofollow">http://&#8230;.</a>&#8221; is a bad start IMO. These feeds need to be a small percentage of what you do, too or you might as well use &#8220;Spamstream:&#8221; as a header. I think if you set twitterfeed to limit posts to 1 every 2 hours, you&#8217;ll find a good balance. YMMV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicholi</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>nicholi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a tip. Stop spamming twitter with a link to this page. Blocked @kristofcreative</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a tip. Stop spamming twitter with a link to this page. Blocked @kristofcreative</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptamaro</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>ptamaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Twitter since it rolled out two years ago. At first, I thought it was kinda cool, then I became addicted to it. I&#039;ve since gained some control and just enjoy tweeting and stuff.

That said, I&#039;ve seen the flow change over time and seen new stuff as it rolls out like @reply and #hash RT&#039;s and DM&#039;s. I&#039;ve also sen the tweet flow devolve into what it is now and I guess I still dig it – it&#039;s still fun for me, and most of the things folks have mentioned don&#039;t really bother me, yet.

I don&#039;t have a whole lot of followers but I could see how folks would get peeved about a lot of the things mentioned above....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Twitter since it rolled out two years ago. At first, I thought it was kinda cool, then I became addicted to it. I&#8217;ve since gained some control and just enjoy tweeting and stuff.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;ve seen the flow change over time and seen new stuff as it rolls out like @reply and #hash RT&#8217;s and DM&#8217;s. I&#8217;ve also sen the tweet flow devolve into what it is now and I guess I still dig it – it&#8217;s still fun for me, and most of the things folks have mentioned don&#8217;t really bother me, yet.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a whole lot of followers but I could see how folks would get peeved about a lot of the things mentioned above&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arif Gangji</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Arif Gangji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Sorry to jump in again...

@chadengle - One thing I love is the ability to shoot out a poll or question and get feedback.  Great research tool and if done properly, everyone gets credit, and community outweighs competition.

That means everyone has to interact though.  Give and Take, give and take baby.  

There are many great things about twitter...I&#039;ll let others share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to jump in again&#8230;</p>
<p>@chadengle &#8211; One thing I love is the ability to shoot out a poll or question and get feedback.  Great research tool and if done properly, everyone gets credit, and community outweighs competition.</p>
<p>That means everyone has to interact though.  Give and Take, give and take baby.  </p>
<p>There are many great things about twitter&#8230;I&#8217;ll let others share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Nowack</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Nowack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Great site; most everyone hit on what I was thinking (especially Selene; double-kudos to skewed following to follower ratio!)  What I like about Twitter, though, is that you have the ability to control the content you see.  As many people already mentioned, I also quickly scan Twitter pages of those who follow me before I choose to follow them back.  If the person is an obvious direct marketer, I don&#039;t follow.  Bad direct marketers will simply float to the bottom in time.  

-@AndreaNowack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site; most everyone hit on what I was thinking (especially Selene; double-kudos to skewed following to follower ratio!)  What I like about Twitter, though, is that you have the ability to control the content you see.  As many people already mentioned, I also quickly scan Twitter pages of those who follow me before I choose to follow them back.  If the person is an obvious direct marketer, I don&#8217;t follow.  Bad direct marketers will simply float to the bottom in time.  </p>
<p>-@AndreaNowack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Young</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/totally-lame-twitter-marketing-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=6#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I love all the posts above. One more that&#039;s an automatic &quot;won&#039;t follow&quot; is people who have nothing but &quot;New Blog Post:...&quot; for their Tweets. Look, I love making life simple, but Twitter is not JUST a place to rebroadcast your Blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love all the posts above. One more that&#8217;s an automatic &#8220;won&#8217;t follow&#8221; is people who have nothing but &#8220;New Blog Post:&#8230;&#8221; for their Tweets. Look, I love making life simple, but Twitter is not JUST a place to rebroadcast your Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
