<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many Quality Twitter Followers Do You Have?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/quality-twitter-followers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/quality-twitter-followers/</link>
	<description>&#34;What Not To Do&#34; Twitter Marketing Guide by Twitters and for Twitters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/quality-twitter-followers/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=59#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your example that emphasizes why auto following people can be such a bad idea. If you just want a large number of followers, then using automated bots or scripts will do that -- but there&#039;s no value in just numbers. Like you said, too many people with the same mindset doing the exact same thing. 

Marketing with postcards is something I&#039;m very familiar with. It can be a great sales tool (even if just making one more touch) but only when targeted to people who are already interested in purchasing a product or service. In my opinion, I can&#039;t see this working on Twitter. Like I mentioned above, people join Twitter for social reasons - not to buy products. You also have two other issues to consider; 1. Cost Per Acquisition/Follower which will be extremely high. 2. Getting followers to give you their mailing address. Since a mailing address isn&#039;t included in a Twitter profile, you would need to create a separate landing page just for this purpose. And if you&#039;re going to go to that much effort, I would focus on simply getting them to opt into a email list. It&#039;s faster, easier and cheaper to implement.

Bottom line: social networking is about engagement. And it&#039;s the engagement (conversations with a real person) that breeds loyalty. So if you want to grow a passionate group of followers, then post content worthy of being ReTweeted and engage your followers in honest and helpful conversation. The more you give, the more you&#039;ll receive in return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your example that emphasizes why auto following people can be such a bad idea. If you just want a large number of followers, then using automated bots or scripts will do that &#8212; but there&#8217;s no value in just numbers. Like you said, too many people with the same mindset doing the exact same thing. </p>
<p>Marketing with postcards is something I&#8217;m very familiar with. It can be a great sales tool (even if just making one more touch) but only when targeted to people who are already interested in purchasing a product or service. In my opinion, I can&#8217;t see this working on Twitter. Like I mentioned above, people join Twitter for social reasons &#8211; not to buy products. You also have two other issues to consider; 1. Cost Per Acquisition/Follower which will be extremely high. 2. Getting followers to give you their mailing address. Since a mailing address isn&#8217;t included in a Twitter profile, you would need to create a separate landing page just for this purpose. And if you&#8217;re going to go to that much effort, I would focus on simply getting them to opt into a email list. It&#8217;s faster, easier and cheaper to implement.</p>
<p>Bottom line: social networking is about engagement. And it&#8217;s the engagement (conversations with a real person) that breeds loyalty. So if you want to grow a passionate group of followers, then post content worthy of being ReTweeted and engage your followers in honest and helpful conversation. The more you give, the more you&#8217;ll receive in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarketMaverikNZ</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/quality-twitter-followers/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>MarketMaverikNZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=59#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I’ve been using Twitter for 3 weeks now and spent hours and hours trying to master what I thought was a good twitter strategy (get as many followers as possible via profile keyword search using auto-bots) but I soon discovered that my stream was getting clogged by “Teeth Whitening” pitches and MLM/Affliate crap.

Plus when I auto unfollowed I discovered that the unfollow was reciprocated immediately by those I culled – Aye?

So I reasoned that they were following the same strategy I was. Pursuing what I thought were targeted followers ended up being a spam fest with little value exchanged either way.

Thank goodness I’ve STOPPED.

I’m of two minds:

Either I keep my following and follower ratios really low and build strong reciprocal relationships on a small scale…but do it organically

Or I build I really large following using both and automated (20% say) and an organic approach and set myself apart by providing really good content and using offline techniques to build strong relationships with my followers.

Nobody and I mean nobody on Twitter is doing this – Do you think if I had 20k followers and I sent out this stuff to my heavy hitters do you think they would look out for my tweets amongst the clutter – Not enough value is being exchanged.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been using Twitter for 3 weeks now and spent hours and hours trying to master what I thought was a good twitter strategy (get as many followers as possible via profile keyword search using auto-bots) but I soon discovered that my stream was getting clogged by “Teeth Whitening” pitches and MLM/Affliate crap.</p>
<p>Plus when I auto unfollowed I discovered that the unfollow was reciprocated immediately by those I culled – Aye?</p>
<p>So I reasoned that they were following the same strategy I was. Pursuing what I thought were targeted followers ended up being a spam fest with little value exchanged either way.</p>
<p>Thank goodness I’ve STOPPED.</p>
<p>I’m of two minds:</p>
<p>Either I keep my following and follower ratios really low and build strong reciprocal relationships on a small scale…but do it organically</p>
<p>Or I build I really large following using both and automated (20% say) and an organic approach and set myself apart by providing really good content and using offline techniques to build strong relationships with my followers.</p>
<p>Nobody and I mean nobody on Twitter is doing this – Do you think if I had 20k followers and I sent out this stuff to my heavy hitters do you think they would look out for my tweets amongst the clutter – Not enough value is being exchanged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fesibeeasence</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/quality-twitter-followers/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Fesibeeasence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=59#comment-74</guid>
		<description>I am unable to understand this post. But well some points are useful for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am unable to understand this post. But well some points are useful for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt waterman</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/quality-twitter-followers/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>matt waterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=59#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Whats the best tool to clean up none followers?

Ohh follow me here http://www.twitter.com/mattwaterman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats the best tool to clean up none followers?</p>
<p>Ohh follow me here <a href="http://www.twitter.com/mattwaterman" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com/mattwaterman</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meroko</title>
		<link>http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/twitter-marketing/quality-twitter-followers/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Meroko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lametwittermarketing.com/?p=59#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t lose many followers in the cleanup. I think this is mostly due to the fact that I would regularly block spammers, although I&#039;m very glad that they &quot;cleaned house&quot;. I hope they do it on a regular basis.

I am probably in the minority, but I do not ever plug my blog on twitter, don&#039;t advertise it...don&#039;t even advertise my design business, except on my twitter home page. I use Twitter to cultivate relationships, not for my own personal gain. (And because Twitter is a lot of fun!). This is not to say I won&#039;t ever do so, but it is not my main reason for being on Twitter.

I wouldn&#039;t care if I had only 10 followers, if they were people that I have quality relationships with. However, having a larger following does give me more opportunities to cultivate those relationships. You never know when/where it will come from. I love learning from all of you, but at the same time, it&#039;d make me very happy if you said &quot;Hello, how are you?&quot; (and meant it) once in a while instead of sitting on the sidelines. You all have something unique to add.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t lose many followers in the cleanup. I think this is mostly due to the fact that I would regularly block spammers, although I&#8217;m very glad that they &#8220;cleaned house&#8221;. I hope they do it on a regular basis.</p>
<p>I am probably in the minority, but I do not ever plug my blog on twitter, don&#8217;t advertise it&#8230;don&#8217;t even advertise my design business, except on my twitter home page. I use Twitter to cultivate relationships, not for my own personal gain. (And because Twitter is a lot of fun!). This is not to say I won&#8217;t ever do so, but it is not my main reason for being on Twitter.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t care if I had only 10 followers, if they were people that I have quality relationships with. However, having a larger following does give me more opportunities to cultivate those relationships. You never know when/where it will come from. I love learning from all of you, but at the same time, it&#8217;d make me very happy if you said &#8220;Hello, how are you?&#8221; (and meant it) once in a while instead of sitting on the sidelines. You all have something unique to add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
